Quest for corals: unveiling the anatomy of a scientific expedition to Bonaire

Quest for corals: unveiling the anatomy of a scientific expedition to Bonaire

In March 2023, while tourists were enjoying the wondrous coral reefs of Bonaire and the commodities of its capital, Kralendijk, five scientists from the Paleontology department of Freie Universität Berlin landed at Flamingo International Airport with over 100 kg of diving and scientific gear. Their goal was to collect coral samples and use the information archived in their skeletons to unravel past disturbances and stressors in the Bonairean coral reefs.

However, this adventure started long before that, with an odyssey to secure all the essential permits and equipment. In some cases, it actually meant engineering instruments to facilitate proper sample collection, such as stainless-steel drill bars and a frame used to aid the drilling process.

This frame facilitates drilling perpendicularly to the main growth axis of the corals – a crucial step to assess their growth density bands. In addition, it constrains drifts from the drill on the topmost surface of the coral, particularly common at the beginning of the drilling process, which can cause significant tissue damages. After months of thinking, elaboration, and eventually a leap of faith, the frame construction was a great success for which we must greatly thank Detlef Müller, his team from the Physics department at the Freie Universität Berlin, as well as Benjamin Rommel, from the Geology department at the Freie Universität Berlin.

On the 6th of March, with everything ready, we crossed the Atlantic Ocean and finally landed on Bonaire. At this point, it is a common misconception that scientific field work is a romantic combination of breath-taking dives intercut by naps under palm trees on the beach and immersion into the local culture. While there was some of that, the reality was quite different – certainly not because of Bonaire’s wonderful beaches which, interestingly, can have more coral rubble than white sand.

In fact, everyday would start at 6 o’clock, divers would be in the water by 8:30 the latest, and the days would be full of activities until 10 pm – so there was not much room for naps on the beach. Still, all the amazing dives and a couple of days off gave us the energy and motivation to keep accomplishing our goals.

The first challenge in the field was to find the coral chosen for the study – the coral Siderastrea siderea. It is a main reef-building species in the Atlantic reefs that produces seasonal growth bands (visible under X-rays), is long-lived (up to a few centuries) and stress-tolerant. However, during our recognition dives, we witnessed the spread of the Stony-Coral Tissue-Loss Disease (SCTLD), a new disease to the island that is severely impacting corals in the Caribbean since 2016. Filtering out those areas affected by the presence of SCTLD increased the challenge to find appropriate colonies of S. siderea.

Luckily, S. siderea corals were not affected by SCTLD, and we were able to determine relevant sampling sites based on their exposure to human impacts. The next step was to select a sufficient number of colonies, which should ideally be large enough to provide several decades of growth records. Additionally, they should appear healthy, so that biases associated with individual performance are avoided, and be isolated from other organisms, as it diminishes the chances of accidentally touching other organisms. After the coral colonies of interest were selected, the next step was to successfully retrieve cores from them.

This process proved to be challenging as the air supply was based on diving tanks – and our friend “Drill” can breath a lot! To provide air supply for the drill, snorkelling buddies replaced empty tank bottles on the surface while divers drilled and collected the coral cores underwater. The divers needed to find the correct angle for drilling, collect the core from inside of the colony, fit a cement plug into the hole left by the core, and bring the samples safely to the boat/coast. There, tissue samples were immediately collected for genetic analyses and cores were catalogued. The support of boats and their crew members allowed us to access more distant sites and improved our sampling effort, despite a limited number of days. All this effort could not have been possible without the invaluable support of STINAPA and its staff, as well as Charlie.

The cores were dried, labelled, stored, and transported back to Berlin. Their density growth bands will be identified with use of Computerised Tomography (CT) scans and X-rays, in collaboration with the Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung (IZW) in Berlin and the Universität Leipzig. The annual growth rates of these corals may reveal temporal trends and associations with environmental changes documented over the past decades. The geochemical composition of their skeletons (i.e., trace element concentrations) will also be assessed, and may assist in the identification of chronic or episodic stressors potentially impacting these reefs. This information will contribute to conservation and management strategies aimed at protecting, conserving, and restoring these unique ecosystems.

Share this post

Blue Nature-based Solutions: Charting a course to overcome challenges to implementation

Blue Nature-based Solutions: Charting a course to overcome challenges to implementation

In our ever-evolving quest for sustainability, we are increasingly turning to nature for inspiration. From wetlands to coral reefs, marine and coastal ecosystems around the world offer a treasure trove of solutions to some of our most pressing environmental and societal challenges. Harnessing this, the concept of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) is gaining momentum as a management approach that provides shared solutions to interconnected environmental and societal challenges. NBS embed nature and people into decision-making and are designed to enhance biodiversity while concurrently improving human health and wellbeing by contributing to, for example, efforts to mitigate climate change, support adaptation, and boost food security. However, when it comes to blue NBS – those centred around marine and coastal ecosystems – progress in implementation has been slow. To understand why and what we can do about it, we convened Northern European blue NBS practitioners to discuss challenges to blue NBS implementation and their recommendations for overcoming the most significant ones.

Challenges to blue NBS implementation

Practitioners identified twelve implementation challenges overall but considered those that most affect blue NBS implementation to be policy drivers, funding mechanisms, and engagement with stakeholder groups directly involved and/or affected by NBS, have a vested interest, and can influence decision-making. Discussions about these were wide-ranging, repeatedly emphasising challenges surrounding political will and clarity, long-term sustained investment, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Meeting the challenges

To overcome challenges, practitioners made six recommendations. These recommendations were designed to help overcome the main three challenges but also offer a path forward for addressing all twelve challenges initially identified, as they are so closely intertwined.

Advancing blue NBS implementation

As we confront the challenges of a rapidly changing world, blue NBS could help harness diverse perspectives and create resilient, sustainable communities for generations to come. While the challenges and recommendations discussed echo familiar themes in marine conservation and management, they underscore the need for concerted efforts to accelerate progress in blue NBS implementation. Concept clarification, improved standards, and social-political support will be crucial for blue NBS to fulfil their promise. Existing networks and stakeholder groups are driving momentum, but scaling up efforts and ensuring the long-term effectiveness of blue NBS requires enhanced collaboration, communication, and funding to unlock their potential. 

The full citation of the paper is: O’Leary BC, Wood LE, Cornet C, Roberts CM, Fonseca C. (2024) Practitioner insights on challenges and options for advancing blue Nature-based Solutions. Marine Policy 163:106104.

The full paper can be found here.

Share this post

Research priorities for marine and coastal Nature-based Solutions (NBS)

Reproduced from O’Leary et al 2023.

Research priorities for marine and coastal Nature-based Solutions (NBS)

A core goal of the project MaCoBioS is to develop innovative research pathways and provide evidence-based guidance for marine policy formulation on Nature-Based Solutions (NBS).

In delivering this goal, we recently brought together twenty-one researchers from a breadth of scientific disciplines to identify research priorities for advancing understanding and informing implementation of marine and coastal NBS. Led by MaCoBioS researchers Dr Bethan O’Leary at the University of Exeter and Dr Catarina Fonseca at the University of the Azores, this collaborative work was supported by other members of the MaCoBioS team together with researchers from two other EU Horizon 2020 projects ‘Climate Change and Future Marine Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity’ (FutureMARES) and ‘Large scale RESToration of COASTal ecosystems through rivers to sea connectivity’ (REST-COAST).

Our three research priorities

To date, NBS have been largely studied for terrestrial – particularly urban – systems, with limited uptake thus far in marine and coastal areas. Yet, marine and coastal systems are of immense value to people and nature, face unprecedented risks from climate change and human impacts, and NBS offer a powerful strategy to reduce direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss and environmental degradation. We have therefore proposed three key interrelated research priorities for advancing NBS understanding and informing implementation in marine and coastal areas:

Biodiversity and ecosystem science: improve understanding of marine and coastal biodiversity-ecosystem services relationship. Our world is rapidly changing, and we need to understand risks to biodiversity and new opportunities for better management. Advancing knowledge on links between marine and coastal biodiversity, ecosystem health, vulnerability, functions, and services will help us do this and make us better placed to maximise the effectiveness of NBS as they are deployed.

Implementation guidance: provide scientific guidance on how and where to implement marine and coastal NBS and better coordinate across NBS strategies and projects. By improving our understanding of which marine and coastal NBS offer the greatest value, and how and where to implement and coordinate strategies for them, we can better implement management and help overcome barriers to NBS implementation.

People-centric research and action: develop ways to enhance marine and coastal NBS communication, collaboration, ocean literacy and stewardship. People are a critical part of the natural world and we need to better integrate and engage with local communities and other stakeholders in research and management to raise awareness, boost buy-in and increase societal benefits of NBS.

Embracing NBS in marine and coastal areas for transformative change

These are a broad set of priorities intrinsically linked to each other that go far beyond what one project can deliver. Collaboration between researchers and practitioners will be key and we need to concentrate investment and research efforts to move forwards with marine and coastal NBS design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Moving forward, MaCoBioS hopes that these research priorities can help inspire new research that operates with the same holistic approach as NBS – creating actionable science that embeds people and nature and helps us embrace NBS in the science, policy and practice of managing marine and coastal ecosystems for tangible benefits to people and marine life.

The full citation of the paper is: O’Leary BC, Fonseca C, Cornet CC, de Vries MB, Degia AK, Failler P, Furlan E, Garrabou J, Gil A, Hawkins JP, Krause-Jensen D, Le Roux X, Peck MA, Pérez G, Queirós AM, Różyński G, Sanchez-Arcilla A, Simide R, Sousa Pinto I, Trégarot E, Roberts CM. (2023) Embracing Nature-based Solutions to promote resilient marine and coastal ecosystems. Nature-Based Solutions 3:100044.

The full paper can be found here.

Share this post

WORKING TOGETHER TO MOVE FORWARDS WITH NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS

WORKING TOGETHER TO MOVE FORWARDS WITH NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS

MaCoBioS and CMCC were excited to welcome participants from across the Mediterranean to Lecce, Italy on the 29thand 30th September 2022 to discuss how we can identify spatial opportunities for marine and coastal Nature-based Solutions.

Our goal was to bring together policy-makers and practitioners who are working to improve management of marine and coastal ecosystems through nature-based approaches and provide a forum to foster learning, explore current and future challenges faced by management, and consider solutions. Here is the host and coordinator, Elisa Furlan, giving a short overview of the workshop.

The agenda was packed. Thought-provoking presentations, in-depth discussions, a trip to the Torre Guaceto Marine Protected Area, tasty food, and lots of sharing of ideas. Our conversations were focused around how we can better manage cumulative risks from human activities and climate change in marine and coastal spaces and inform decisions about where NBS could be targeted. A common theme that ran through all our discussions was the urgent need to reduce direct human pressures on marine and coastal ecosystems where they occur prior to other actions. Without doing so, the effectiveness of any other form of management, such as restoration actions, would be limited. There were lots of interesting discussions about balancing pragmatism and opportunity with application of predictive models that can offer more strategic direction. We also discussed what such models should contain and how they should be communicated. Displayed below is a brief synopsis of the workshop.In the end, we were happy with the positive feedback received from participants, who found the workshop interesting and highlighted the importance of these events.

We’d like to thank all of the people who made our workshop a success by giving their time and valuable insights which helped shape this important dialogue and tool development.

Share this post

What is marine coastal ecological restoration?

What is marine coastal ecological restoration?

Human activities, as well as climatic disasters, are degrading natural habitats, which negatively impacts the entire ecosystem (i.e., the habitat and its associated living organisms of which humans are a part). Such a damaged ecosystem can return to its native state if a restoration program is implemented. This recovery can happen faster and be more effective if the damage to the ecosystem is not too important. For example, a mangrove forest can be replanted after deforestation caused by its use in firewood. Moreover, a damaged seagrass meadow can be restored by transplantation of plants from a different location. More generally, the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER, 2004) has defined ecological restoration as a process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged or destroyed.

Figure 1: Transplantation of Cymodocea a seagrass specie.

The importance of ecological restoration

Ecological restoration projects are now coming to the forefront of sustainable development issues such that the United Nations (UN) has declared the current decade (2021-2030) as the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. At the same time, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the UN Environment Programme(UNEP), in partnership with 10 African and Asian countries, have joined forces to create The Restoration Initiative (TRI), with the aim of bridging the gap between restoration ambition and tangible progress on the ground.” The Society for Ecological Restoration has further defined 8 principles to guide the implementation of restoration projects. Each project must involve all of the chosen ecosystem’s stakeholders and therefore rely on various knowledge sources (i.e., practitioner knowledge, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Local Ecological Knowledge, and scientific discovery). The project must build on reference ecosystems while accounting for environmental changes and thus support the natural restoration processes of the ecosystem. In addition, the project must be evaluated against clear objectives using measurable indices, allowing the highest level of restoration to be targeted. Finally, the restoration action must gain cumulative value when applied on a large scale and thus be part of a continuum of restorative activities. If this last principle is followed in addition to the other ones, ecological restoration could then also be considered a Nature-based Solution as it contributes to protecting biodiversity and improving human wellbeing when implemented effectively and sustainably.

Figure 2 : The eight principles for Ecological Restoration (SER, 2019)

The challenges we need to address

One of the main challenges in restoration projects is to define the historical baseline towards which the restoration tends. Moreover, it is difficult to achieve a large scale or real continuum due to the large anthropization of Nature. This is all even more true in coastal marine habitats, where restoration technics are also less advanced due to the technological challenge the marine environment often represent.

As ecological restoration can be defined as a Nature-based Solution under certain condition develop above, the MaCoBioS project will consider ecological restoration as a possible solution in its way to propose different kind of Nature-based Solution to conserve, manage and restore marine coastal area in a climate change situation.

Share this post

What are Nature-Based Solutions ?

What are Nature-Based Solutions ?

The Nature-based Solution concept

Our societies are currently facing many challenges. Some are not new, such as food and water security, while others, more recent, are more directly linked to human activities, such as climate change. In this context, Nature-based Solutions, or NbS, provide solutions to these societal challenges by relying on what nature already provides. Several approaches that combine protection, management, and restoration of ecosystems already exist. The key novelty of the NbS concept is that such approaches must be beneficial to biodiversity while improving human well-being. For example, a mangrove forest fixes the coastline and thus protects it from possible flooding (which risk increases due to climate change), but it can also sequester four times more carbon than a rainforest per unit area. Therefore, protected, managed, or restored mangroves can help to mitigate and adapt to climate change. In addition, co-benefits in terms of biodiversity occur by providing habitat for numerous marine and terrestrial species.

Figure 1: Definition of NbS: From IUCN. (2020). Guidance for using the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: a user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling u of NbS. Source: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.en

The term NbS was clearly defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)[1] and the European Union (EU)[2] in an effort to bring together all ecosystem-related approaches already meeting this dual purpose of benefiting biodiversity and human well-being to answer to a societal challenge. This term is thus intended as an umbrella term.

What makes a Nature-based Solution?

The IUCN has defined 7 societal challenges to which NbS must respond: (1) climate change mitigation and adaptation, (2) food security, (3) water security, (4) disaster risk reduction, (5) human health, (6) economic and social development, and (7) environment degradation and biodiversity loss. In 2020, the IUCN has also published global standards that allow characterising protection, management, and restoration actions as NbS through 8 criteria. These criteria include the need to address at least one of the above societal challenges, as well as the benefit to biodiversity and human well-being through sustainable management and implementation. An NbS must also be designed at a large spatial (generally defined as land‑, freshwater- and seascape) and temporal scale (several decades) in partnership with all stakeholders for inclusive, sustainable, and integrated governance. In addition, this solution must be economically feasible and the positive effects quickly observable, but can also be adaptive, which makes its strength. Taking the example of a salt marsh that needs to be managed to limit the risk of flooding, one possible action is to plant and facilitate the development of vegetation capable of regulating the water flow. However, depending on the plant species, the growth of the plants can be more or less long. In this context, artificial management of the water flow can be set up so that positive effects on the scale of the first year can be observed while waiting for the natural action of the vegetation to be effective. Finally, to be recognised as an NbS, the effectiveness of the actions implemented and any land-use planning developed should be measurable. In this context, it is imperative to have tools capable of assessing the effectiveness of an NbS. These tools must be developed around scientific studies, based on in-depth knowledge of ecosystems and their services, as well as the links between biodiversity and environmental health in contexts of varying anthropic pressures. Further research is also needed to understand better the interconnection between biodiversity, climate change and provided services within ecosystems to recommend actions that could be an effective NbS in a specific area. 

Figure 2: The 8 criteria of the global standards for NbS published by the IUCN: From IUCN. (2020). Guidance for using the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: a user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling u of NbS. Source: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.en

The way ahead for marine and coastal Nature-based Solutions

NbS can apply to both natural and modified ecosystems (such as urban areas). Currently, most NbS have been identified in urban and terrestrial environments and agriculture sector, while natural marine environments and their specificities are less considered and very few NbS have been recorded. One of the main reasons is that it is more challenging to implement and then evaluate out of sight large-scale actions in the ocean. The lack of basic knowledge on ecological responses to marine ecosystem-based approaches in terms of ecosystem service provision or biodiversity gain is also an obstacle to proposing relevant NbS in the marine context. MaCoBioS thus aims to address these knowledge gaps and disseminate the principles and purpose of NbS to coastal marine ecosystems’ stakeholders.

[1] “Nature-based Solutions are actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural and modified ecosystems that address societal challenges effectively and adaptively, simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits. They are underpinned by benefits that flow from healthy ecosystems and target major challenges like climate change, disaster risk reduction, food and water security, health and are critical to economic development.” Source: https://www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-solutions/about

[2] The Commission defines nature-based solutions as: “Solutions that are inspired and supported by nature, which are cost-effective, simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits and help build resilience. Such solutions bring more, and more diverse, nature and natural features and processes into cities, landscapes and seascapes, through locally adapted, resource-efficient and systemic interventions.” Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en

Share this post